Volvo C70 2009 vs Renault Megane 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 220 HP | 110 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 400 NM | 151 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | 7.8 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.6 | 5.0 - 8.1 | |
|
Volvo C70 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Volvo C70 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo C70 is 13 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 211 litres | |
|
Volvo C70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo C70 has 193 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Renault Megane, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`108 | ~ 1`887 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |