Volvo C70 2009 vs Volkswagen EOS 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 220 HP | 122 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 400 NM | 200 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | 7.8 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.6 | 4.8 - 7.5 | |
|
Volvo C70 petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen EOS. On average, Volvo C70 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger, but lower. Volvo C70 is 19 cm longer than the Volkswagen EOS, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 205 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 380 litres | |
|
Volvo C70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo C70 has 199 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen EOS, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`108 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Volkswagen EOS has
| |