Volvo C70 2009 vs Mazda MX-5 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Volvo C70 is available with front wheel drive, while Mazda MX-5 can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 220 HP | 126 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 - 400 NM | 167 - 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | 7.6 - 9.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 9.6 | 7.0 - 8.0 | |
|
Volvo C70 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda MX-5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.26 m | |
|
Volvo C70 is larger. Volvo C70 is 36 cm longer than the Mazda MX-5, 12 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C70 is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 150 litres | |
|
Volvo C70 has more luggage capacity. Volvo C70 has 254 litres more trunk space than the Mazda MX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C70 is 2 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Volvo C70 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`108 | ~ 1`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C70 has
|
Mazda MX-5 has
| |