Volvo C30 2010 vs Volvo C30 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Volvo C30 2010 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo C30 2010 engine produces 41 HP more power than Volvo C30 2006, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volvo C30 2006. Thanks to more power Volvo C30 2010 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volvo C30 2010 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30 2006, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C30 2010 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volvo C30 2010 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30 2006. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1130 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo C30 2006 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo C30 2010 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo C30 2006, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 233 litres | 251 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volvo C30 2010 has 18 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C30 2006. This could mean that the Volvo C30 2010 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C30 2010 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo C30 2006, which means Volvo C30 2010 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 1`840 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Volvo C30 2010 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C30 2006 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo C30 2010, so Volvo C30 2010 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |