Volvo C30 2006 vs Volkswagen Golf 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volvo C30 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo C30 engine produces 53 HP more power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Volkswagen Golf. Thanks to more power Volvo C30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo C30 consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C30 could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volvo C30 2006 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo C30 2006 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo C30 is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo C30 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 233 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1305 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Golf has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo C30 has 117 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf. This could mean that the Volvo C30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C30 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Volvo C30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C30 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |