Volvo C30 2006 vs Volvo C30 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 220 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| Volvo C30 2006 engine produces 10 HP less power than Volvo C30 2009, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.0 | |
| Volvo C30 2006 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30 2009, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C30 2006 could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Volvo C30 2009 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo C30 2006 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo C30 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 921 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volvo C30 2009 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C30 2006 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Volvo C30 2009, so Volvo C30 2009 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |