Volvo C30 2006 vs Seat Ibiza 2012

 
Volvo C30
2006 - 2009
Seat Ibiza
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 136 HP143 HP
Torque: 320 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.4 seconds8.2 seconds
Seat Ibiza is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo C30 engine produces 7 HP less power than Seat Ibiza, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volvo C30 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.74.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.2 l/100km5.6 l/100km
The Seat Ibiza is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volvo C30 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C30 could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C30 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle970 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1150 km on highway
880 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.25 m4.05 m
Width: 1.78 m1.69 m
Height: 1.45 m1.44 m
Volvo C30 is larger.
Volvo C30 is 20 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C30 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres292 litres
Seat Ibiza has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Volvo C30 has 41 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. This could mean that the Volvo C30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo C30 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza.
Power steering: Hydraulic power steeringElectric power steering
Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8401`696
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

below average
Seat Ibiza has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C30 has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Seat Ibiza, so Seat Ibiza quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 40005200
Pros and Cons: Volvo C30 has
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Seat Ibiza has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • electric power steering
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv