Volvo C30 2006 vs Volvo C30 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 HP | 145 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
Volvo C30 2006 and Volvo C30 2009 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
The Volvo C30 2006 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo C30 2006 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30 2009, which means that by driving the Volvo C30 2006 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C30 2006 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30 2009. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
690 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.25 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo C30 2006 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo C30 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 921 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`750 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 4200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
| |