Volvo C30 2006 vs Suzuki Liana 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 144 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Volvo C30 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo C30 engine produces 19 HP more power than Suzuki Liana, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Suzuki Liana. Thanks to more power Volvo C30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Liana is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo C30 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Liana, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo C30 could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C30 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Liana. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V50, Volvo S40 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Liana might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.23 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Volvo C30 is larger, but lower. Volvo C30 is 2 cm longer than the Suzuki Liana, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C30 is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C30 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Liana, which means Volvo C30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Suzuki Liana has
| |