Volvo C30 2006 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Volvo C30 engine produces 41 HP less power than Chrysler PT Cruiser, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Chrysler PT Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Volvo C30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo C30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo C30 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means that by driving the Volvo C30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C30 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo C30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.60 m | |
| Volvo C30 is 4 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C30 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 538 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage space. Volvo C30 has 287 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C30 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Volvo C30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Volvo C30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler PT Cruiser has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Volvo C30, so Volvo C30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |