Volvo C30 2006 vs Alfa Romeo 147 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 147 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo C30 engine produces 41 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 147, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Alfa Romeo 147. Due to the lower power, Volvo C30 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo C30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo C30 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 147, which means that by driving the Volvo C30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo C30 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 147. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo C30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo V50 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Fiat Bravo, Alfa Romeo GT | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo C30 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo C30 is larger. Volvo C30 is 3 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 147, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C30 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1030 litres | |
|
Alfa Romeo 147 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo C30 has 41 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 147. This could mean that the Volvo C30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C30 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 147, which means Volvo C30 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`855 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Volvo C30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 147 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Volvo C30, so Volvo C30 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Alfa Romeo 147 has
| |