Volvo C30 2009 vs Volkswagen Beetle 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo C30 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo C30 engine produces 4 HP more power than Volkswagen Beetle, but torque is 10 NM less than Volkswagen Beetle. Thanks to more power Volvo C30 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 55 litres | |
| 1000 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Volvo C30 is smaller. Volvo C30 is 1 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Beetle, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo C30 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 905 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Beetle has more luggage space. Volvo C30 has 59 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Beetle. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C30 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Beetle. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`780 | 1`750 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Beetle scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Beetle scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Beetle has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo C30, so Volkswagen Beetle quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Volkswagen Beetle has
| |