Volvo C30 2009 vs Peugeot 308 2008

 
Volvo C30
2009 - 2013
Peugeot 308
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Diesel1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain

Performance

Power: 109 HP175 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 seconds8.3 seconds
Peugeot 308 is a more dynamic driving.
Volvo C30 engine produces 66 HP less power than Peugeot 308, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volvo C30 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.57.6
The Volvo C30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volvo C30 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 308, which means that by driving the Volvo C30 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 52 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
1360 km on highway1050 km on highway
Volvo C30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo C30 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 5 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo V50Used also on Peugeot 207
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.27 m4.28 m
Width: 1.78 m1.82 m
Height: 1.44 m1.50 m
Volvo C30 is smaller.
Volvo C30 is 1 cm shorter than the Peugeot 308, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo C30 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres348 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1398 litres
Peugeot 308 has more luggage space.
Volvo C30 has 97 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 308.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo C30 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Peugeot 308.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7801`855
Safety:
Quality:
below average

low
Volvo C30 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 308 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo C30, so Volvo C30 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 48002800
Pros and Cons: Volvo C30 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • fewer faults
Peugeot 308 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv