Volvo C30 2006 vs Volvo C30 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 230 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 350 NM | 150 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 11.9 seconds | 6.7 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.4 | 4.5 - 9.0 | |
|
Volvo C30 2006 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo C30 2009. On average, Volvo C30 2006 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30 2009. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo C30 2006 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo C30 2009, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 921 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C30 2006 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo C30 2009, which means Volvo C30 2006 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`816 | ~ 1`848 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |