Volvo C30 2006 vs Toyota Yaris 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.0 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 - 230 HP | 69 - 133 HP | |
Torque: | 150 - 350 NM | 93 - 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 11.9 seconds | 9.1 - 15.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.4 | 4.2 - 7.0 | |
Volvo C30 petrol engines consumes on average 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Yaris. On average, Volvo C30 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.25 m | 3.79 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.45 m | 1.53 m | |
Volvo C30 is larger, but lower. Volvo C30 is 46 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volvo C30 is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 313 litres | |
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo C30 has 62 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Volvo C30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 9.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo C30 is 1.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Volvo C30 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`816 | ~ 1`499 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | high | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |