Volvo C30 2006 vs Seat Ibiza 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 230 HP | 70 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 350 NM | 112 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 11.9 seconds | 7.8 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 - 9.4 | 3.4 - 6.6 | |
|
Volvo C30 petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Ibiza. On average, Volvo C30 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.45 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo C30 is larger. Volvo C30 is 20 cm longer than the Seat Ibiza, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 938 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo C30 has 41 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. This could mean that the Volvo C30 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C30 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Ibiza. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`816 | ~ 1`604 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |