Volvo C30 2009 vs Volvo V40 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 230 HP | 115 - 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 400 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 11.8 seconds | 6.3 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 9.0 | 3.2 - 9.0 | |
|
Volvo C30 petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Volvo C30 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Volvo C30 is smaller, but slightly higher. Volvo C30 is 10 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
921 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Volvo C30 has 84 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C30 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`848 | ~ 1`976 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volvo V40 scores higher in safety tests. The Volvo V40 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |