Volvo C30 2009 vs Volvo V50 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Volvo C30 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo V50 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 100 - 230 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
Torque: | 150 - 400 NM | 150 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 11.8 seconds | 6.9 - 12.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 9.0 | 5.0 - 10.1 | |
Volvo C30 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V50. On average, Volvo C30 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.27 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
Volvo C30 is 25 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo C30 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 417 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
921 litres | no data | |
Volvo V50 has more luggage space. Volvo C30 has 166 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`848 | ~ 1`943 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 4200 | 3200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |