Volvo C30 2009 vs Volvo C30 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 - 230 HP | 100 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 - 400 NM | 150 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 11.8 seconds | 6.7 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 9.0 | 4.9 - 9.4 | |
|
Volvo C30 2009 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C30 2006. On average, Volvo C30 2009 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30 2006. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo C30 2009 is 2 cm longer than the Volvo C30 2006, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
921 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo C30 2009 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo C30 2006, which means Volvo C30 2009 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`848 | ~ 1`816 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo C30 has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |