Volvo 940 1990 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo 940 engine produces 7 HP more power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.5 | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 940 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Volvo 940 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 940 and Volvo 960 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 491 litres | |
|
Volvo 960 has more luggage space. Volvo 940 has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
| |