Volvo 940 1990 vs Ford Scorpio 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 201 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 940 engine produces 30 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.7 | |
| Volvo 940 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 940 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.43 m | |
| Volvo 940 is 13 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 940 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means Volvo 940 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Scorpio has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
| |