Volvo 940 1990 vs Audi 80 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 940 engine produces 32 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Audi 80. Thanks to more power Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo 940 consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 940 could require 390 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 940 consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 1150 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi 80 1991 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Audi 80 1991 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Volvo 940 is larger. Volvo 940 is 39 cm longer than the Audi 80, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
|
Volvo 940 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 940 has 40 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Volvo 940 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Audi 80 has
| |