Volvo 940 1990 vs Audi 100 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 940 engine produces 2 HP more power than Audi 100, but torque is 25 NM less than Audi 100. Despite the higher power, Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo 940 consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 940 could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 940 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 1250 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi 100 1990 2.5 engine: Reliable and robust engine, keep an eye on the cooling system and the timing belt change interval. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
| Volvo 940 is 8 cm longer than the Audi 100, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 940 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 570 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 610 litres | |
|
Audi 100 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volvo 940 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Audi 100. This could mean that the Volvo 940 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 1.7 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Volvo 940 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Audi 100 has
| |