Volvo 940 1990 vs VAZ 2105 1980
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 50 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 92 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 23 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 940 engine produces 72 HP more power than VAZ 2105, whereas torque is 148 NM more than VAZ 2105. Thanks to more power Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 11.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 6.7 | |
|
The VAZ 2105 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 940 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the VAZ 2105, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 940 could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 39 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 1.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Volvo 940 is larger, but slightly lower. Volvo 940 is 344 cm longer than the VAZ 2105, 13 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 940 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 345 litres | |
|
Volvo 940 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 940 has 125 litres more trunk space than the VAZ 2105. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`395 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
VAZ 2105 has
| |