Volvo 940 1990 vs Jaguar XJ 1986
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 940 engine produces 41 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Due to the lower power, Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 10.3 | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 940 consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that by driving the Volvo 940 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Volvo 940 is smaller, but slightly higher. Volvo 940 is 12 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 940 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 2.5 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means Volvo 940 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |