Volvo 940 1990 vs Volvo 940 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 264 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Volvo 940 1990 engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo 940 1996, whereas torque is 34 NM more than Volvo 940 1996. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 75 litres | |
| 490 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 940 1990 and Volvo 940 1996 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 471 litres | |
| Volvo 940 1990 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940 1996. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volvo 940 1996 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 940 1990 has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Volvo 940 1996, so Volvo 940 1996 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |