Volvo 940 1992 vs Volvo 940 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 1996 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 940 1992 engine produces 53 HP less power than Volvo 940 1996, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Volvo 940 1996. Due to the lower power, Volvo 940 1992 reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 940 1992 and Volvo 940 1996 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 471 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volvo 940 1996 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 940 1992 has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Volvo 940 1996, so Volvo 940 1996 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo 940 has
| |