Volvo 940 1992 vs Volvo 940 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 1992 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 940 1992 engine produces 20 HP more power than Volvo 940 1996, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volvo 940 1992 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 940 1992 and Volvo 940 1996 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 470 litres | 471 litres | |
| Volvo 940 1992 has 1 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 940 1996. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Volvo 940 1996 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 940 1992 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Volvo 940 1996, so Volvo 940 1996 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |