Volvo 940 1996 vs Ford Scorpio 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 264 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 940 engine produces 18 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 62 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo 940 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the Volvo 940 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 940 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.39 m | |
| Volvo 940 is 5 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 940 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`905 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Scorpio has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |