Volvo 940 1996 vs Volvo 940 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 264 NM | 203 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 1996 is more dynamic to drive. Volvo 940 1996 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo 940 1990, whereas torque is 61 NM more than Volvo 940 1990. Thanks to more power Volvo 940 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 10.1 | |
| Volvo 940 1996 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940 1990, which means that by driving the Volvo 940 1996 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 940 1996 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 940 1996 and Volvo 940 1990 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | 470 litres | |
| Volvo 940 1996 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo 940 1990. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`905 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Volvo 940 1996 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 940 1990 has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Volvo 940 1996, so Volvo 940 1996 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
| |