Volvo 940 1990 vs Volvo 960 1994
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 233 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 940 engine produces 48 HP less power than Volvo 960, but torque is 7 NM more than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 10.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo 940 consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Volvo 940 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 390 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 940 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
910 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 940 is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, width is practically the same , while the height of Volvo 940 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 992 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | 2125 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo 960. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 2`060 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |