Volvo 940 1990 vs Audi 100 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Audi 100 is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 940 engine produces 7 HP more power than Audi 100, but torque is 25 NM less than Audi 100. Despite the higher power, Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Audi 100 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volvo 940 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volvo 940 could require 225 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volvo 940 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 100. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 1230 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 1190 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi 100 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Audi 100 1991 2.5 engine: Very reliable engine if not overheated. Occasionally, the high pressure fuel pump can cause problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 940 is 2 cm longer than the Audi 100, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | 1310 litres | |
|
Volvo 940 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 940 has 602 litres more trunk space than the Audi 100. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 940 (by 815 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 1.5 metres less than that of the Audi 100, which means Volvo 940 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 2`025 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Audi 100 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Audi 100 has
| |