Volvo 940 1992 vs Mercedes E class 1993
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.4 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 HP | 113 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 16.3 seconds | |
Mercedes E class is a more dynamic driving. Volvo 940 engine produces 31 HP less power than Mercedes E class, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Mercedes E class. Due to the lower power, Volvo 940 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 7.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 72 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
Volvo 940 is larger, but lower. Volvo 940 is 5 cm longer than the Mercedes E class, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 940 is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 530 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | 885 litres | |
Volvo 940 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 940 has 462 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes E class. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 940 (by 1240 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 1.3 metres less than that of the Mercedes E class, which means Volvo 940 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`190 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | high | |
Mercedes E class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo 940 has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mercedes E class, so Mercedes E class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Mercedes E klase has
| |