Volvo 940 1990 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volvo 940 engine produces 35 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 77 NM less than Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 11.2 | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volvo 940 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Volvo 940 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Volvo 960 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volvo 940 is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | 2125 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`975 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |