Volvo 940 1990 vs Audi 80 1986

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volvo 940
1990 - 1996
Audi 80
1986 - 1991
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Volvo 940 is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi 80 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.41.6 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 82 - 165 HP54 - 140 HP
Torque: 145 - 264 NM100 - 181 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 - 16.5 seconds9 - 22 seconds
In general, Volvo 940 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi 80. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.5 - 10.35.3 - 11.5
Volvo 940 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi 80. On average, Volvo 940 equipped with diesel engines consume 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.39 m
Width: 1.75 m1.70 m
Height: 1.41 m1.40 m
Volvo 940 is larger.
Volvo 940 is 48 cm longer than the Audi 80, 5 cm wider, while the height of Volvo 940 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 471 litres485 litres
Despite its longer length, Volvo 940 has 14 litres less trunk space than the Audi 80. This could mean that the Volvo 940 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 9.9 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means Volvo 940 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`878~ 1`538
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 24001600
Rating in user reviews: 8.9/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volvo 940 has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Audi 80 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv