Volvo 940 1996 vs Ford Scorpio 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.3 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Ford Scorpio is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 135 - 165 HP | 115 - 207 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 - 264 NM | 167 - 281 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 - 11 seconds | 9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.3 - 12.6 | |
|
Volvo 940 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Scorpio. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.39 m | |
| Volvo 940 is 5 cm longer than the Ford Scorpio, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 940 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 471 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`905 | ~ 1`743 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |