Volvo 940 1990 vs Opel Omega 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 82 - 190 HP | 73 - 200 HP | |
Torque: | 145 - 280 NM | 138 - 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 17 seconds | 8.2 - 20.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 10.5 | 7.2 - 11.3 | |
Volvo 940 petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Omega. On average, Volvo 940 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.81 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.48 m | |
Volvo 940 is 4 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volvo 940 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 992 litres | 540 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2125 litres | 1855 litres | |
Volvo 940 has more luggage capacity. Volvo 940 has 452 litres more trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 940 (by 270 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volvo 940 is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Volvo 940 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`955 | ~ 2`029 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volvo 940 has
|
Opel Omega has
| |