Volkswagen Corrado 1991 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Corrado is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Corrado engine produces 8 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 2 NM less than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Corrado reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Corrado is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Corrado consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Corrado over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Corrado consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 850 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Corrado gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 1997: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Volkswagen Corrado is smaller. Volkswagen Corrado is 48 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Corrado is 37 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
810 litres | 670 litres | |
| Volkswagen Corrado has 140 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Corrado (by 140 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Corrado is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`545 kg | 1`900 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`175 kg | 1`430 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 370 kg | 470 kg | |
| Volkswagen Corrado load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 27 procentiem less than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Corrado has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |