Volkswagen Corrado 1991 vs Nissan 200 SX 1988
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan 200 SX is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Corrado engine produces 33 HP less power than Nissan 200 SX, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Nissan 200 SX. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Corrado reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.2 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Corrado is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Corrado consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan 200 SX, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Corrado over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Corrado consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Corrado gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Corrado) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Nissan 200 SX) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.29 m | |
| Volkswagen Corrado is 49 cm shorter than the Nissan 200 SX, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Corrado is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
810 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan 200 SX has more luggage space. Volkswagen Corrado has 85 litres less trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Corrado has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |