Volkswagen Caravelle 1996 vs Volvo XC90 2003
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 95 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 120 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 8.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 12.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Caravelle engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Volkswagen Multivan | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Caravelle engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.74 m | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is 39 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Caravelle has 291 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`720 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |