Volkswagen Caravelle 1996 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18.1 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 38 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 62 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 6.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Caravelle is 30 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 19 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4130 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage space. Volkswagen Caravelle has 380 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`700 | 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |