Volkswagen Caravelle 1998 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 10 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 6.2 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is larger. Volkswagen Caravelle is 16 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 256 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Caravelle has 284 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`610 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |