Volkswagen Caravelle 1990 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 94 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 10.5 | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Caravelle gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is larger. Volkswagen Caravelle is 16 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 3 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 21 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
5400 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caravelle is 0.8 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Caravelle can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`590 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |