Volkswagen Caravelle 1990 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 40 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 9.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Caravelle gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 41 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is larger. Volkswagen Caravelle is 19 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 29 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 540 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
5400 litres | 240 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caravelle (by 5160 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caravelle is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Volkswagen Caravelle can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`590 kg | 2`180 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`700 kg | 1`510 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 890 kg | 670 kg | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Therefore, Volkswagen Caravelle is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |