Volkswagen Caravelle 1990 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, but torque is 28 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 | 8.8 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Caravelle gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Runner might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.79 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is larger. Volkswagen Caravelle is 52 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 14 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 28 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
5400 litres | 1498 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Caravelle has 136 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. This could mean that the Volkswagen Caravelle uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caravelle (by 3902 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caravelle is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Volkswagen Caravelle can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`590 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |