Volkswagen Caravelle 1990 vs Chevrolet Astro 1985

 
Volkswagen Caravelle
1990 - 1996
Chevrolet Astro
1985 - 1995
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol4.3 Petrol

Performance

Power: 110 HP167 HP
Torque: 190 NM319 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 57 HP less power than Chevrolet Astro, whereas torque is 129 NM less than Chevrolet Astro.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data13.1
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres102 litres
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Caravelle) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Astro) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.79 m4.49 m
Width: 1.84 m1.97 m
Height: 1.94 m1.94 m
Volkswagen Caravelle is 30 cm longer than the Chevrolet Astro, 13 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 540 litresno data
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): 2`5902`699
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 30002800
Pros and Cons:
    Chevrolet Astro has
    • more power
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv