Volkswagen Caravelle 1996 vs Volvo XC90 2003
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 159 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 21.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 126 HP less power than Volvo XC90, whereas torque is 161 NM less than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 12.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.19 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.94 m | 1.74 m | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is 39 cm longer than the Volvo XC90, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2404 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Caravelle has 291 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`600 | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.9/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |