Volkswagen Caravelle 2004 vs Chevrolet Astro 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 4.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 174 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 16 HP less power than Chevrolet Astro, but torque is 61 NM more than Chevrolet Astro. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 12.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Caravelle is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 4.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Astro, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Caravelle over 15,000 km in a year you can save 675 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 102 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Caravelle gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.90 m | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is 7 cm longer than the Chevrolet Astro, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4825 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Caravelle has 40 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Astro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Chevrolet Astro has
| |