Volkswagen Caravelle 2003 vs Renault Trafic 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Trafic is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Trafic, but torque is 20 NM more than Renault Trafic. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.7 | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.96 m | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is 11 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
5800 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |