Volkswagen Caravelle 2004 vs Renault Trafic 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.3 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
|
Renault Trafic is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Caravelle engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Trafic, but torque is 20 NM more than Renault Trafic. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.7 | |
|
The Volkswagen Caravelle is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Caravelle over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.96 m | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle is 11 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |