Volkswagen Caravelle 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.3 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Caravelle and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.4 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.95 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Volkswagen Caravelle is larger. Volkswagen Caravelle is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Caravelle has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |