Volkswagen Caravelle 2003 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

 
Volkswagen Caravelle
2003 - 2009
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP115 HP
Torque: 170 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.3 seconds15.2 seconds
Volkswagen Caravelle and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Caravelle reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.49.4
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Volkswagen Caravelle consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Caravelle could require 150 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 760 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
950 km on highway940 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.89 m4.63 m
Width: 1.90 m1.81 m
Height: 1.95 m1.73 m
Volkswagen Caravelle is larger.
Volkswagen Caravelle is 26 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 9 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Caravelle is 22 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 1210 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
5800 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Caravelle is 1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Volkswagen Caravelle can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 2`850 kg1`800 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 56002200
Rating in user reviews: 7.0/10 6.1/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Caravelle has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv